Abstract
This meta-analysis of 160 semiconductor crystals that were grown in microgravity on orbital vehicles between 1973 and 2016 is based on publicly available information documented in the literature. This analysis provides comparisons of crystal metrics including size, structure quality, uniformity, and improved performance between crystals grown in microgravity or terrestrially. Improvement in at least one of these metrics was observed for 86% of those materials that included data in their studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Microgravity research on fabrication of specialized materials has been a part of low earth orbit research since 19731. Semiconductor crystals grown in microgravity show improved properties visually, grow larger, display structural improvements, have a more uniform composition among multiple crystals, and/or display superior performance over those grown terrestrially2,3,4,5. Exotic semiconductor production in space has the potential to benefit industry through optic, thermoelectric, infrared, and telecommunication applications6. Information about semiconductors fabricated in microgravity was performed in the late 1980s by Regel1, but no updated reports have been made. A larger dataset of inorganic compounds included semiconductors5. This current meta-analysis of semiconductor experimentation in microgravity is based on credible publicly available information documented in the literature between 1973 and 2016. The pertinent metrics found in these sources have been analyzed, including semiconductor material, flight, author(s), journal title, DOI, mission flown, year flown, country of PI, crystal shape, number of crystals, molecular weight, crystal size, unit cell parameters, space group, resistivity, methods, conditions, data reported, flight complications, materials, temperature of experiment, as well as additional relevant comments reported by the authors. The compiled data was evaluated utilizing crystal metrics including crystal size, structure quality, and uniformity, and improved performance between crystals grown in microgravity or terrestrially. Data as of July 22, 2023 is presented herein.
Results
At the time of analysis, 160 semiconductor crystallization experiments in microgravity were performed; 89% (143) came from peer-reviewed journals. The remaining reports derive from graduate theses, NASA technical reports, symposia, and books, and an additional three have been independently verified by a subject matter expert, Dr. Jessica Frick, Stanford University. The compiled research represents 13 countries with many of the contributions (88%) coming from the US (58), Russia/Soviet Union (40), China (16), Japan (14), and Germany (13). The US was a major contributor in this research area (43% of reported findings) until the year 2000. Since that time, the US has contributed to only 27% of the reported findings. Several semiconductor materials (GaSb, GaAs, CdZnTe, InGaSb, etc.) have multiple listings as different crystallization conditions (method, time, temperature, etc.) were used for each listing. This current dataset underwent an initial, more detailed analysis. The authors acknowledge that the data presented here may be skewed toward a positive outcome bias7. Even with this caveat, a preliminary evaluation of the aggregated semiconductor data is performed here.
Discussion
Improvements in crystals grown in microgravity versus terrestrially were evaluated using the following metrics: size, structurally better, more uniform, and improved performance (see Table 1). Of the 160 semiconductor materials fabricated in microgravity, 140 provide data in at least one metric. Given the diversity of applications, experimental goals, and discipline perspectives of the research compiled, not all reports provide data on the same metrics. Reports that did not include data on a particular metric were excluded. The number of crystals used for each evaluation are also reported. Several experiments (20) included none of the above metrics as they were primarily focused on the engineering process, crucible dewetting during crystallization, determination of appropriate magnetic field for preparing diluted magnetic semiconductors, and/or best temperature employed for crystal growth. Compounds that were reported as the “same” showed no change in crystal size, similar structures by optical measurements, and displayed similar performance to their ground grown counterparts. Leading examples for each of the characteristics are described below.
Size is the metric where semiconductor growth in microgravity seems to show the least improvement. For a range of materials (Al-Bi-Sn, InSb-GaSb, CdZnTe, Ge-Si), the decrease in crystal size ranged from slightly smaller to a four-fold reduction8. Of the crystals that were larger in microgravity, the ability to maintain homogeneity with components of different densities in microgravity was often credited as the reason9.
When evaluating uniformity in semiconductor materials grown in microgravity verses terrestrially, several characteristics were reported. In several cases, physical characteristics such as the average apparent density/density profile were more consistent10, the crystallinity was comparable to “high quality crystals” of the same substrate10, and the size of inclusions were more consistent11. Other reports provided evidence that microgravity grown crystals were microscopically homogeneous12, there were more grain boundaries11, and voids were more uniformly distributed13. Examples of when dopants were added (Te and Ce), the distribution of the dopant was more consistent throughout the crystal than terrestrial analogs11,14,15.
Structural improvements were also reported for semiconductor materials. The observed improvements ranged from fewer impurity striations14, more homogeneous visually observable composition11, a lower etch pit density15, fewer macro-defects14, less twinning13, more regular faceting of the surface16, to a smoother surface17. In the dataset, there are examples of less dislocation density in microgravity samples12,15,18. Microgravity provided improved resistivity19, which may be related to fewer defects.
Improvements in the performance of the semiconductor materials were reported in over forty of the sources. As the applications for exotic semiconductors are numerous, there were a wide variety of evaluative measurements including electrical conductivity20, maximum mobility20, minimum carrier concentration20, resistivity11, photoconductivity21, photosensitivity21, transmittance22, and photoluminescence23. Specific applications into devices included radiation detectors19, double heterostructure lasers12, dual gate field effect transistors12, microwave integrated circuits18, and measurements of CO2 absorption24.
Given that researchers from crystallography, material science, physics, electrochemistry, and inorganic chemistry contribute to this field, a lack of consistency is observed in the reported metrics. For the purposes of this report, improvement was defined by each of the authors in the source material. The data used by the source authors to make these determinations ranged from microscopy to resistance measurements. This could mean that there are significant differences in what improvement means. Some experiments show improved results in one metric, while giving similar or decreased results in another8. Looking at improvement in one or more metric (Table 2), the benefits of microgravity grown crystals are substantial with more than 80% of experiments showing improvement. In addition, almost half of the microgravity experiments reported improvement in two metrics.
Methods of producing semiconductor materials in microgravity were very diverse. Of the 160 literature reports, the vast majority (130) utilize melt methods (Bridgman, modified Bridgman, floating zone, traveling heater, etc.)25. A few (11) utilize vapor deposition or other vapor methods. Most of these approaches for semiconductor fabrication showed significant improvement in microgravity, regardless of method (Table 3). Only floating zone/zone melting methods showed slightly more than 50% improvement under microgravity conditions.
Given the potential impact of improved performance, methods for producing semiconductors that are more uniform or improved structural quality are critical. The report of Chen, et al. stated “… these results have surpassed the best analog switch ICs [integrated circuits] made from terrestrially grown wafers in our laboratory … demonstrates the benefits of microgravity environment for growing semiconducting single crystals”26. Even accounting for a positive result bias in reporting, the data in Table 3 suggest that microgravity crystallization techniques offer significant benefits for semiconductor fabrication. By aggregating semiconductor data into a searchable, publicly available database, we provide a tool that allows for quick comparisons between a broad array of studies and applications.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available at the following repository: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zl_B_IbC_UFx4VfFamhCQcGgUdtk64r6wOdQ_wO3lHU/edit#gid=218298295
References
Regal, L. Materials Science Research in Space: Theory – Experiments – Technology (Halstead Press, 1987).
Maes, D. et al. Protein crystallization under microgravity conditions: What did we learn on TIM crystallization from the Soyuz missions? Microgravity Sci. Technol. 19, 90–94 (2007).
Strelov, V., Kuranova, I., Zakharov, B. & Voloshin, A. Crystallizations in space: results and prospects. Cryst. Rep. 59, 781–806 (2014).
Boyko, K. et al. Protein crystallization under microgravity conditions. Analysis of the results of Russian experiments performed on the International Space Station in 2005-2015. Cryst. Rep. 61, 718–729 (2016).
Wright, H. et al. An analysis of publicly available microgravity crystallization data: emergent themes across crystal types. Cryst. Growth Des. 22, 6849–6851 (2022).
Edmunds, L. V. The future of power needs to be exotic. Applied Materials. https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en/nanochip-fab-solutions/nanochip-fab-solutions-july-2019/the-future-of-power-needs-to-be-exotic.html (2019).
Song, F. et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related bias. Health Technol. Assess. 14, 1–193 (2010).
Borisenko, E., Kolesnikov, N., Senchenkov, A. & Fiederle, M. J. Crystal growth of Cd1-xZnxTe by the traveling heater method in microgravity on board of Foton-M4 spacecraft. Cryst. Growth 457, 262–264 (2017).
Yu, J. et al. Homogeneous InGaSb crystal grown under microgravity using Chinese recovery satellite SJ-10. npj Microgravity 5, 8 (2019).
Fiederle, M. et al. Dewetted growth of CdTe in microgravity (STS-95). Cryst. Res. Tech. 39, 481–490 (2004).
Sylla, L. et al Dewetting during the crystal growth of (Cd,Zn)Te:In under microgravity. In 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 122–125 (IEEE, 2008).
Zhong, X.-R. & Lin, L.-Y. Ch. 20, "GaAs Single Crystal Grown in Space," in Space Science in China, Hu, W.-R., Ed. (Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 1997).
Yee, J., Lin, M., Sarma, K. & Wilcox, W. The influence of gravity on crystal defect formation in InSb-GaSb alloys. J. Cryst. Growth 30, 185–192 (1975).
König, F. Zone melting of Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 crystals under microgravity. Cryst. Res. Technol. 33, 219–232 (1998).
Zhou, Y., Xu, J., Chen, L., Huang, Y. & Huang, W. Influence of microgravity on Ce-doped Bi12SiO20 crystal defect. Bull. Mater. Sci. 30, 211–214 (2007).
Zemskov, V., Raukhaman, M. & Belokurova, I. Experiments on crystallization of semiconductors aboard Salyut 6: Soyuz orbital complex. ESA Mater. Sci. 325–329 (1983).
Witt, A., Gatos, H., Lichtensteiger, M., Lavine, M. & Herman, C. J. Crystal growth and segregation under zero gravity: Ge. Electrochem. Soc. 122, 276–283 (1975).
Chen, N. et al. Semi-insulating GaAs grown in outer space. Mater. Sci. Eng. 75, 134–138 (2000).
Fiederle, M. et al. Radiation detector properties of CdTe0.9Se0.1:Cl crystals grown under microgravity in a rotating magnetic field. J. Cryst. Growth 166, 256–260 (1996).
Parfen’ev, R. et al. Tellurium recrystallization under microgravity conditions and the resulting properties of samples. Phys. Solid State 42, 244–252 (2000).
Siffert, P. et al. Characterization of CdTe crystals grown under microgravity conditions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A Accelerators Spectrometers Detect. Associated Equip. 283, 363–369 (1989).
Zhou, Y., Tang, L., Ai, F. & Zhu, J.-X. Crystal growth of bismuth silicon oxide (BSO) in space. J. Inorg. Mater. 18, 211–214 (2003).
Regel, L., Baturin, N., Popov, A., Kostandinov, I. & Manteev, M. Growth of solid electrolytes from the melt under microgravity. In Proc. VIIth Symposium in Materials and Fluid Sciences in Microgravity, ESA SP-295 89–93 (ESA, 1989).
Ahari, H. et al. Effect of microgravity on the crystallization of a self-assembling layered material. Nature 388, 857–860 (1997).
Yin, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Li, X., Yu, J. Melt Growth of Semiconductor Crystals Under Microgravity. In: Hu, W., Kang, Q. (eds) Physical Science Under Microgravity: Experiments on Board the SJ-10 Recoverable Satellite. Research for Development. Springer, Singapore, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1340-0_13
Chen, N., Zhong, X. & Lin, L. Comparison of field effect transistor characteristics between space-grown and earth-grown gallium arsenide single crystal substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 478–479 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Dr. Jessica Frick for her helpful insights, Kevin Engelbert/NASA InSpace Production Applications (InSPA) Portfolio Manager for funding the study (WR 120622), and Butler University for sabbatical support of A.M.W.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.R.W., F.B., H.W., B.W., and A.W. gathered, aggregated, and organized the data. L.H. and A.M.W. performed the analyses. All authors wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkinson, A.R., Brewer, F., Wright, H. et al. A meta-analysis of semiconductor materials fabricated in microgravity. npj Microgravity 10, 73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00410-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00410-7