The Galaxy S7 comes in two different specs, one with the Snapdragon 820, the other with the Exynos 8890. Qualcomm's chipset has a quad-core CPU, two of the Kryo cores clocked at 2.15GHz, the other two - at 1.6GHz.
We have for review the Exynos flavor, and Samsung's own SoC relies on an octa-core CPU solution, in which you have four Mongoose cores, and four Cortex-A53's. The Mongoose cores behave differently depending on the task - two of them can go as high as 2.6GHz, while the other two are idling, or you can have all four of them ticking at 2.3GHz simultaneously. In theory that approach should provide heaps of power for all sorts of apps, regardless of the number of cores they can utilize, while keeping temperature in check.
The different chips obviously come with matching GPUs, the Adreno 530 in the Snapdragon package, and the Mali-T880 MP12 in the Exynos variant. Regardless of chipset, the Galaxy S7 comes with 4GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. A 64GB version is also supposedly going to be available, we haven't seen one yet though.
The Galaxy S7 kicks off with the best single-core result we've seen, on Android that is, and by a long stretch. Remember, one Mongoose core ticks at 2.6GHz in this scenario, and it certainly makes a difference. The S7 edges ahead of the S7 edge (why, of course we're working on a review of that one concurrently), but the difference is well withing the statistical margin of error. And yes, the iPhone 6s still rules in the per-core performance, but it's only got two of them.
Higher is better
The multi-core results are even more impressive. The Galaxy S7 is hands down the fastest performer when all cores are utilized, Android or otherwise this time. The Meizu Pro 5, the highest scoring smartphone with last year's Exynos 7420 chip, sits closest followed by Samsung's own. The Nexus 6P is the highest ranking Snapdragon 810 offering, still not a match when it came out, not a match now.
Higher is better
Compound benchmarks should give a better understanding of overall performance, not just raw processing power. AnTuTu 6 comes first, alphabetically if for no other reason, and it won't be unfair to say that the Galaxy S7 smokes the competition. True, it's the first 2016 flagship we get to test, and results in the 130K ballpark are also to be expected by the myriad of Snapdragon 820 releases this year, it's just that the S7 beat them to it.
Higher is better
Basemark OS II 2.0 comes next and we're starting to wonder if smartphones are approaching the ceiling of what the benchmark can measure. The Galaxy S7's score is only slightly higher than that of the Nexus 6P, and the distance to the ruling iPhone 6s is even smaller. Exynos 7420 devices from last year are further down though, so at least Samsung has managed to improve on its own chip.
Higher is better
On to graphics, to see how those 12 cores of the Mali-T880 GPU stack up. In Basemark X we witness a new record high, comfortably ahead of last-year's Samsung flagships, which in turn posted better numbers than competing Snapdragon 810 models.
Higher is better
Basemark ES 3.1 provides a testing ground for OpenGL ES 3.1-compatible devices, and while results are not 100% immediately comparable, its iOS counterpart Basemark Metal gives a general idea where the two platforms stand relative to each other.
And where they stand is closer than with last year's Android devices, that's for sure. Exynos 8890 scores more than twice as much as 7420 and the Snapdragon 810 is left behind as well. However, it is still the iPhone 6s that remains the true king in this benchmark, and early indications we have of the Snapdragon 820's performance, the status quo is looking to remain unchanged.
Higher is better
GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan is another OpenGL ES 3.1 test and the S7 is doing a very good job. In the offscreen part (run at 1080p on all tested devices regardless of actual display resolution) Samsung's flagship outperforms all of last year's flagships by a mile (hardly a surprise!).
That translates into a solid number in the onscreen test - run at native resolution, where the QHD display of the S7 pulls it back. Still, the 15fps are a marked improvement over the Note5's 6.7fps, and also ahead of the 11fps of the QHD Nexuses.
Higher is better
Higher is better
In the older GFXBench 3.0 test, the S7 matches the iPhone 6s in raw power, testified by the similar offscreen frame rates. These two are in a league of their own, no other phone making it past 65% of the S7's score.
Don't make a big deal out of the difference in onscreen frame rates between the iPhone 6s and the Galaxy S7 - the Samsung phone is dealing with 3.7 times as many pixels. On a level field against the Nexus 6P and Note5, the new GPU shows its strength posting a 60% and 80% higher frame rate, respectively.
Higher is better
Higher is better
In summary, another trend-setting performance by the Galaxy flagship. Heaps of raw CPU power in the S7 are coupled with graphics oomph, which no longer needs to make excuses for low frame rates with high display resolution.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up