This test is just a disaster. Show me anyone watching video on the phone with airplane mode activated... This test is a synthetic measurement which has no relation to real life usage scenario. You'd better keep an old test and don't waste you time and efforts on something useless like a "new" battery test.
Without a proper standby test and numbers this new test is just a variation of old one and as useless as it was before.
javi, 10 Nov 2023Is this a joke? A phone is in standby 90% of the time, if not more. Not factoring standby in a... morePersonally I agree 100%, but it is not generally so, it is a matter of usage pattern.
I guess a substantial portion of users, especially in the younger segment, use the phone a lot more than 10% of the time, and when idle often in/on a charger, so for those the idle consumption is close to unimportant, though it for others like you and me are very important....
So not an easy task to provide a number useful for both segments.
But the numbers from the new test is clearly useless for us, so we will have to look elsewhere.
(Personally I could not care less if a phone can do gaming for one or twenty hour on a charge, offline or online, I rarely even do a sudoku on it...)
Also remember that as the display is a big battery-eater, the brightness matters a lot too, so here also usage patterns affect things.
javi, 10 Nov 2023Is this a joke? A phone is in standby 90% of the time, if not more. Not factoring standby in a... moreI agree completely. More and more people these days keep their phone away from them hence stand-by (with ofc 5G active etc.).
Is this a joke? A phone is in standby 90% of the time, if not more. Not factoring standby in a battery test is just crazy... No, really, tell me this is a prank or something. I've been using the GSMArena Battery test for reference for years and this would make the test unusable.
TheQuatum, 09 Nov 2023This new test is very disappointing and seems very poorly thought out. Turning on airplane mod... moreDxomark battery testing approach is probably the best. The only problem is that they are so slow to test new phones.
All tests should be conducted with 4g connection enabled. What is the point of test with airplane turned on. Nobody uses phone like that.
I truly appreciate the new battery testing measures, I used to max out all of the features and try to calculate without the standby time my self ask these years. All I can say is thank you, looking forward to the next Battery Life Test 3.0 in 2035, Lord Willing.
God bless!
John 3:16
2 Corinthians 5:14-17
Ephesians 2:4-9
This new test is very disappointing and seems very poorly thought out. Turning on airplane mode to disable cellular renders every onscreen test nearly useless. I hope that this new method is reviewed and reverted.
As others have said, "active time", and not including cellular will be misleading, because some phones have much worse standby and/or cellular. So you take active time here and think this is a phone for me and it turns out battery is actually trash for you, because you don't use wifi and standby is awful.
I would be much more convenient to understand the battery test if it is done on mobile and wifi separately. As mobile data affects battery differently then on wifi.
Smallworld, 08 Nov 2023Good thing. Thank you for the improvement, the older test was getting hard to use for compari... moreYes. It isn't that great if focusing on web browsing, video. But it's still 1,5 hours better than S23 base which was also hailed as the battery champ but now looks much worse. On the other hand iPhones now look really good. Oh well
Turning on Airplane mode means Cellular activity is turned off. But it is one of the biggest causes of battery drain.
I hope GSMarena will reflect on their day-to-day experience of battery life in the smartphone reviews.
Anonymous, 08 Nov 2023LOL, still using WiFi to test web browsing. Ridiculous. They are measuring what they can measure, not what needs to be measured as this would be to hard and inconsistent.
I am not so sure that new results make sense. They contradict with results from many other sources.
I suspect the main reason they've done this is because phones like Xperia 10 V and many others were getting to more than 150+ hours endurance rating on their old test, while many mid-range and flagship phones are topping 100+ hours. Probably the old test was just taking too long to run - they needed something which can be finished in 1 day.
It's a bit sad I agree with what other's have said - standby time and time browsing over 4g/5g is important for normal people - still I guess the relative trends and differences between devices should still show up OK with the new methodology.
Wi-Fi for web browsing? really?
This new score is useless as long as doesn't include standby time.
It's a shame this test didn't cover cellular data, because that's one of the main reasons for owning a smartphone at all. Now importantly, the modem's efficiency can have a huge impact on battery life.
I wish "web" test would also be extended to mobile data (with 4g and 5g separately), not just Wi-Fi. Pixel 8 seems to have battery drain issue with 5g mobile data usage, but that's not reflected in your tests.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up