Network | Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
---|---|---|
2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | |
CDMA 800 | ||
3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | |
4G bands | LTE | |
5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | |
Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
Launch | Announced | 2024, June 25 |
---|---|---|
Status | Available. Released 2024, June 28 |
Body | Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
---|---|---|
Weight | 171 g or 173 g (6.03 oz) | |
Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | |
SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
Display | Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) |
---|---|---|
Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) | |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
Platform | OS | Android 14 |
---|---|---|
Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | |
CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | |
GPU | Adreno 619 |
Memory | Card slot | microSDXC |
---|---|---|
Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | |
UFS 2.x |
Main Camera | Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) |
---|---|---|
Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 1080p@30/60fps |
Selfie camera | Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
---|---|---|
Video | 1080p@30fps |
Sound | Loudspeaker | Yes |
---|---|---|
3.5mm jack | No |
Comms | WLAN | Yes |
---|---|---|
Bluetooth | Yes | |
Positioning | GPS | |
NFC | Yes | |
Radio | No | |
USB | USB Type-C |
Features | Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical); unspecified sensors |
---|
Battery | Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable |
---|---|---|
Charging | 30W wired |
Misc | Colors | Olivine, Surf, Gray |
---|---|---|
Models | XT2427-4 |
Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more
Snapdragon 6s gen 3 (SM6375-AC) only has 2.3GHz version. The 2.2GHz version is Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
it depends upon the brand as they optimize or lock the processor at a specific clock speed, which might be cheap for them.
Both the 1080 or 778G would have been a better option. Older and way more powerful. Cpu and GPu wise. G84 also should have had 780 or 778G, instead went for the weak 695 they had left in stocks. What is Motorola even doing.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up