Oppo F1s review: A second take

A second take

GSMArena team, 19 August 2016.

The gallery

The default Gallery on the Oppo F1s is also straightforward to the extreme. You get a total of two interfaces, the first being a photo stream and the other - a split up view, organized in convenient image sets.

Gallery app - Oppo F1s review Gallery app - Oppo F1s review
Gallery app

There is a bit more functionality, hidden under the hood. The edit option, for one, offers a pretty decent number of tools. You can quickly crop an image or doodle on it. There are also filters available.

Quick image editing - Oppo F1s review Quick image editing - Oppo F1s review Quick image editing - Oppo F1s review Quick image editing - Oppo F1s review
Quick image editing

Music player

The default music player is just that - a music player, nothing more, nothing less. You get all the basics, like categorized browsing (track, artist, album) and a very clean playback interface with some default animations as well as album art support.

You also get playlists and even favorites. You can also apply an equalizer by enabling Dirac Sound option which, however, is buried in the settings menu.

Music Player - Oppo F1s review Music Player - Oppo F1s review Music Player - Oppo F1s review Music Player - Oppo F1s review
Music Player

You get an FM radio app as well. It works fine, but is also pretty basic seeing how the receiver does not support RDS and there are no extras like TrackID or recording.

Radio app - Oppo F1s review
Radio app

Video player

The video player is a basic app as well, which offers clean looks but almost nothing in terms of advanced features. There is one notable exception - you can play clips in a hover window. The video player supports playback of DTS audio codec but not AC3 audio codec.

Video Player - Oppo F1s review Video Player - Oppo F1s review Video Player - Oppo F1s review
Video Player

Audio output not very clean

The Oppo F1s did poorly in the active external amplifier part of our audio quality test, which is not a good start. While its volume levels were very high, the clarity just wasn’t there, and we recorded poor dynamic range and signal-to-noise ratio as well as plenty of distortion. The stereo crosstalk was higher than most competitors manage with headphones.

With that serving as a base, we didn’t have very high expectations for the headphones test. It brought more of the same only this time loudness also fell to below average and frequency response got even shakier. A poor showing no matter how you look at it.

TestFrequency responseNoise levelDynamic rangeTHDIMD + NoiseStereo crosstalk
Oppo F1s+0.37, -0.00-71.275.30.936 1.190-41.2
Oppo F1s (headphones)+0.80, -0.05-67.874.60.336 0.579-42.3
Huawei Honor 7 Lite (5c)+0.03, -0.44-90.490.90.0019 0.011-87.9
Huawei Honor 7 Lite (5c) (headphones)+0.04, -0.47-90.390.70.0067 0.072-73.1
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) +0.04, -0.24-92.492.50.024 0.023-91.3
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) (headphones) +0.37, -0.04-88.590.60.045 0.226-56.9
Sony Xperia E5 +0.14, -0.81-92.392.40.0072 0.0093-91.9
Sony Xperia E5 (headphones) +0.15, -0.88-89.588.90.0090 0.370-50.7
Motorola Moto G4 +0.02, -0.07-92.492.50.0028 0.0084-92.1
Motorola Moto G4 (headphones) +0.04, -0.08-92.092.00.0073 0.070-63.8
Sony Xperia XA +0.01, -0.18-93.690.60.0030 0.010-91.7
Sony Xperia XA (headphones) +0.85, -0.18-87.187.80.018 0.327-54.9
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus+0.02, -0.08-93.892.80.0037 0.034-91.3
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus (headphones)+0.09, -0.03-93.592.60.070 0.075-49.0
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)+0.02, -0.07-94.392.20.0065 0.010-95.0
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) (headphones)+0.42, -0.01-93.487.10.029 0.254-53.0

Oppo F1s frequency response
Oppo F1s frequency response

You can learn more about the tested parameters and the whole testing process here.

Reader comments

  • Lucky 12
  • 03 Jul 2024
  • r3c

I have the same phone mine is working fine

  • Anonymous
  • 24 Jun 2024
  • CD3

My oppo have a big poblem I can't go to play store and watsapp

  • Wayne
  • 20 May 2024
  • XFY

My oppo has problem with data is only accept WiFi connection and the apps names are numbers instead of actual name